Talk:Ohio State Route 59

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


as far as i know akron can still annex surrounding municipalities, as it threatened to do a year ago regarding Blakemore.

--UltraSkuzzi 23:37, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)


I don't think Akron can annex any more land. It made JEDD agreements with all of the townships around it and part of the agreement was that Akron could not annex land from the townships for a long time, 99 years I believe. I don't know what the deal was with Lakemore, but Akron can't annex it since it is incorporated. It could merge with Lakemore or any other surrounding communities, but that is unlikely to happen.


Huh, i'll have to recheck my facts. I'm not a big fan of destroying infrastructure, so i hope Pasquelic (sp?) errs on the side of caution and works on revitalization of what we do have rather then the endless cycle of build and abandon.

--UltraSkuzzi 00:56, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Beacon Writeup[edit]

They had a rather interesting Piece in The Beacon today about Future Plans for the Innerbelt

Let's grow Innerbelt, not nuke it

Exit list adjustment[edit]

Someone needs to update the exit list to reflect the actual routing, not the signposted one along Perkins and the MLK Innerbelt, and a separate exit list for 59T should be created to account for the Perkins/MLK routing. (If nobody else does, I will eventually.) Mapsax (talk) 20:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never mind. I just checked the SLD (now the revision of Jan '08), and the official and signposted routings now match. I will revert my edits. Mapsax (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC) [Added] The SLD for SR-8 (also from Jan '08) still shows the old set-up on the diagram portion, though no longer on the interchange illustration. Mapsax (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


See Talk:Ohio State Route 261#Categories as my restoration of a category and an external link, along with the addition of other relevant categories, was for the same reasons as there. An "inapplicable" link would be a link to something that has nothing to do with the specific route. And remember, appropriate categories are anything that the route can be associated with, especially the cities and counties it passes through. --JonRidinger (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]