Talk:Mary Moorman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

"(or a mechanically-suppress-fired bullet bow shockwave)"

Can someone translate this into English for wiki readers who are not familiar with ballistics jargon? Gamaliel 18:12, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Note that this is not the HSCA article and is not the place for discussion about their conclusions. This article is for information about Moorman. Gamaliel 02:35, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Some notes on the latest revert[edit]

  1. It is rude to accuse another editor of vandalism over a content dispute.
  2. Those links you are deleting are about Moorman and her photograph and are thus directly relevant. There is no reason to delete them.
  3. This is not the HSCA article and is not the place for their conclusions.
  4. The idea that the HSCA "scientifically determined to better than a 95% probability" the exact spot of a second shooter based on acoustic evidence is utter nonsense.
Gamaliel 01:02, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

eBay live auction[edit]

eBay Live Auctions, discontinued in December 2008, were differentiated listings linked to physical or virtual auction houses, and moderated by a live auctioneer. These listings were not subject to a specific end time; Live Auctions concluded when there were no further bids. I report this because someone earlier removed the word "live" not understanding how the auction was any different from a standard eBay auction. — Walloon (talk) 02:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photographic Details[edit]

This article is missing VERY important information relating to the Polaroids she shot that afternoon.

This article needs the following explained (as fully as possible):

What print type was used?

Where are the originals (negatives included) materials now?

If original material is not available, then what copies were made, and how (how many generations 'away' have been taken from the source, original photon stimulated and processed materials, if known)?

Where is the camera now? This is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT - AS THIS CAN BE TESTED TO PROVE THAT IT IS OR IS NOT THE ORIGINAL CAMERA - and if tested positive, then further tests can be made to establish its transmission qualities (properties).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.47.194 (talk) 01:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Moorman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mary moorman' s ankle injury[edit]

The WC and WCR could have easily depositioned Mary Moorman at home. Makes no sense, if a true sprained ankle. The best view and probable view is that Moorman was threatened not to testify to WC. Or was paid not to testify. Makes no sense. Total lack of common sense in a forensic murder case of such historic prop- ortions. Defies reality and credibility. Anyway, she did talk/depose factoids with the FBI that same day. Still, this lacuna is troubling and unacceptable in any historical review. Typical of the WC and the DC swamp and media mindset of that day. Facts did not always matter, because the storyline had been already set and such. Thus the truth suffers, even to today,2024. JS 2601:145:8003:2930:A109:8129:3BB3:8D75 (talk) 13:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Still alive in 2020?[edit]

I found a page for someone claiming to be Mary Moorman, which was last updated in December 2020 - https://www.facebook.com/maryann.krahmer/.

Skycloud86 (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]